Power, Rhetoric, and Democracy

Since the Citizens United decision, outside spending in elections has surged. For example, non-party independent groups’ spending has increased from about $750 million in the two decades before the decision to approximately $4.5 billion in the decade following it. This influx of money has created a political environment where candidates are often outspent by these external groups, leading to a situation where the interests of the wealthiest donors and corporations can outweigh those of ordinary citizens​ (Brennan Center for Justice, Legal Research Club).

The decision also catalyzed the rise of “dark money” in politics—funds used for electioneering where the donors are not disclosed. This phenomenon has further skewed political influence towards the wealthiest entities, contributing to growing public concern about the fairness and equity of the democratic process​ (FEC.gov).

In summary, the Citizens United ruling has reinforced the power of economic elites in shaping policy, illustrating the challenges of ensuring equitable influence within a democratic framework. This underscores the ongoing debate about the need for campaign finance reform to restore balance to the democratic process ​(Legal Research Club).

Rhetoric as a Tool of Power

Rhetoric, the art of persuasion, is a powerful tool in the hands of those who seek to influence public opinion and policy. Throughout history, political leaders have used rhetoric to rally support, justify actions, and legitimize power. However, rhetoric is a double-edged sword; it can illuminate truth or obscure it, depending on the intentions of the speaker.

Consider the famous speeches of leaders:

Winston Churchill’s wartime speeches were more than mere oratory; they were a lifeline to a nation on the brink. His words, delivered with a poetic cadence, transformed fear into fortitude, rallying the British people with a message of unyielding defiance. In his iconic phrase, “we shall fight on the beaches,” Churchill didn’t just speak to his countrymen—he forged a collective resolve, turning the tide of despair into a surge of national pride and endurance (SpringerLink, International Churchill Society).

In contrast, the rhetoric of demagogues has often served as a dark art, manipulating public sentiment through fear and division. Leaders like Father Charles Coughlin and Huey Long wielded their words as weapons, exploiting anxieties and scapegoating the vulnerable to erode trust in democratic institutions. Their speeches, laced with fear-mongering, sought to fracture societies and consolidate power at the expense of unity and democratic values​ (FDR Foundation).

These two uses of rhetoric highlight its immense power: to either uplift and unite in the face of adversity or to sow division and undermine the very foundations of democracy.

Democracy: The Ideal vs. The Reality

Democracy, in its ideal form, is a system where power is exercised by the people for the people, and rhetoric is used to inform and engage the public in meaningful dialogue. Yet, the reality often falls short of this ideal. Power can become concentrated, rhetoric can become manipulative, and democracy itself can be eroded from within.

For instance, the rise of populism in recent years has indeed highlighted the powerful role rhetoric can play in polarizing societies and undermining democratic norms. Populist leaders frequently employ divisive language that frames “the people” against an elite class, creating an us-vs-them narrative. This strategy is designed to unify a broad and diverse base of grievances into a single, supposedly unified voice, which can then be used to justify sweeping political changes that often erode democratic institutions. By positioning themselves as the true representatives of the people, these leaders often sideline or dismantle checks and balances, undermining the rule of law and other democratic safeguards​ (Journal of Democracy, Cambridge University Press & Assessment).

A clear example of this can be seen in the Brexit campaign in the United Kingdom. The rhetoric used during the campaign, particularly by proponents of leaving the European Union, was steeped in populist themes. It often portrayed the EU as an out-of-touch elite institution that was out of sync with the will of the British people. This narrative was instrumental in swaying public opinion towards a Leave vote, illustrating how populist rhetoric can significantly influence democratic outcomes, with consequences that continue to unfold years after the referendum (SpringerLink ,Cambridge University Press & Assessment).

These developments underscore the importance of critically examining the rhetoric used by political leaders, as it has the power to either strengthen or weaken the very foundations of democracy​ (Home Page).

The Dynamic Interplay

The interaction between power, rhetoric, and democracy is a dynamic and often volatile process. Rhetoric can be a tool for empowering the powerless, but it can also be used to entrench the power of the already powerful. Similarly, power can be used to uphold democratic principles or to subvert them.

The media plays a critical role in this interplay, acting as both a platform for rhetoric and a check on power. However, in the current era of misinformation and “fake news,” the role of the media has become increasingly complex. The advent and proliferation of social media platforms have significantly amplified this dynamic, often distorting public discourse. Social media’s structure, which rewards frequent sharing and engagement, has been found to play a critical role in the spread of misinformation. This system encourages users to share sensational or eye-catching content, including false information, without critically evaluating its accuracy. This behavior is further reinforced by the algorithms that prioritize such engaging content, thereby magnifying the reach and impact of misinformation​ (SpringerLink, USC Today).

Moreover, the ability of social media to rapidly disseminate information means that misinformation can spread far more quickly than traditional media can correct it. This has created an environment where public discourse is often shaped by misleading or false narratives, complicating efforts to maintain an informed and cohesive society​ (SpringerLink).

As a result, the media’s role is now not only to inform but also to actively combat the spread of misinformation, a challenge made more difficult by the decentralized and viral nature of content on social platforms​ (American Psychological Association).

Critical Reflections

As we reflect on the current state of democracy, it is essential to recognize our role in this triad. As citizens, voters, and members of the public, we are both the recipients and participants in the dance of power and rhetoric. We must critically assess the rhetoric we encounter, question the concentration of power, and actively engage in the democratic process to ensure it remains vibrant and true to its ideals.

The challenges are significant, but so too is the potential for renewal. By fostering a culture of informed and respectful dialogue, we can reclaim the democratic values that have been eroded and build a more equitable and just society.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

In navigating the complexities of power, rhetoric, and democracy, we must remain vigilant and proactive. The future of democracy depends on our ability to engage thoughtfully with rhetoric, challenge the concentration of power, and work collectively toward a more inclusive and participatory system.

The path forward is not without obstacles, but by recognizing the power of rhetoric and the importance of democratic principles, we can chart a course toward a more just and resilient society.

Related Readings

• The Influence of Money in Politics

  • Academic reference: Oxford Academic.

• The Role of Media in Democracy

  • Brookings Institute: The Democracy Playbook (Brookings).
  • Oxford Academic: Oxford Academic.

• Populism and the Erosion of Democratic Norms

  • Wilson Center: Is Populism Really a Problem for Democracy? ​(Wilson Center).
  • Institute for Global Change: The Populist Harm to Democracy: An Empirical Assessment​ (Tony Blair Institute).

What do you think is the most significant threat to democracy today? Reach out through our contact form.